Hybridity and Tibetan language education policies in Sichuan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47381/aijre.v28i2.150Keywords:
hybridity, Tibetan language education policy, discoursesAbstract
This paper presents the Sichuan case study: Badi Primary School, a semi-agro-pastoral town primary school in Danba County of Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province. Section 1 introduces the context of the town and the school. This is done by analyzing discourses of education policy in the town and the school. Through this analysis I contextualize the hybridity and Tibetan language in Sichuan which is the subject of this study. This section is used as a basis for hybridity policy enactment processes of Tibetan language education policy actors – agendas – actions – artifacts, which is detailed presented in Section 2. Interaction of hybridity in discourses and discursive strategies in this school community is discussed in the final section. Focusing on the concern relating to Hybridity and Tibetan language in Sichuan, Sichuan’s Tibetan language education as research site, and discourse theory as analytical tool I also consider the language education policy trajectory over the last 20 years of economic and social change in Sichuan, including the impact of neo-liberalism and marketization on education policy for Tibetans.
References
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M. & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
Balibar, E. (1991). Is There a “Neo-Racism� In E. Balibar & Wallerstein, I. (Ed.), Race, nation, class: ambiguous identities. London: Verso.
Carmen Caldas-Coulthard, R., & Rick, I. (2008). Identity trouble: critical discourse and contested identities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clarke, M. (2012). The (absent) politics of neo-liberal education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 297-310.
Cummins, J. (2000). Beyond adversarial discourse: Searching for common ground in the education of bilingual students. In C. J. Ovando & P. Mclaren (Ed.), The Politics of multiculturalism and bilingual education: Students and teachers caught in the cross fire (pp. 126-147). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Cummins, J. (2001). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard educational review classic reprint. Harvard Educational Review, 71(4), 656-675.
Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Freeman, R. (2008). Identity, community and power in bilingual education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Part 5, 77-89.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(2000-2001), 99-125.
Harrell, S. (2001a). Perspectives on the Yi of Southwest China. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Harrell, S. (2001b). Ways of being ethnic in Southwest China. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
Kolås, Å. (2003). Teaching Tibetan in Tibet: Bilingual education is survival. Cultural survival quarterly 27(3), 67–71. Retrieved from
http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/csq/
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. Culturally Relevant Teaching, 32(3), 465-491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2004). New directions in multicultural education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In J. A. Banks & C. A. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 50-65). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Nima, B. (2000). Puzzlement of civilization: The way of Tibetan education. Sichuan: Sichuan Nationality Publishing House.
Nima, B. (2001). Problems related to bilingual education in Tibet. Chinese Education & Society, 34(2), 91-102.
Yi, L. (2011). Ethnicization through schooling: The mainstream discursive repertoires of ethnic minorities. In C. Mackerras (Ed.), Ethnic minorities in modern China (pp. 305-412). London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 28-11-2018 (2)
- 29-11-2018 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors contributing to The Australian and Internation Journal of Rural Education agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 license, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to The Australian and Internation Journal of Rural Education.
Manuscripts submitted for publication should not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. It is the responsibility of authors to secure release of any copyright materials included in their manuscripts, and to provide written evidence of this to the editors.
Papers are accepted on the understanding that they are subject to editorial revision. The Editorial Committee cannot guarantee that all contributions will be published nor give definite dates of publication. However, contributors will be advised if their papers are not accepted or if there will be a long publication delay.