G'aim'ing to be a rural teacher?: Improving pre-service teachers' learning experiences in an online rural and remote teacher preparation course
Many Australian teachers will spend part of their careers working in small rural schools and communities, yet specific preparation for rural and remote teaching contexts during pre-service teacher education remains limited. While government reports recommend the use of innovative and engaging approaches to enhance pre-service teachers’ classroom readiness, the use of such approaches to the contextualised preparation of rural and remote teachers has not been specifically addressed.
In a teacher education program, an innovative place-based pedagogy has been utilised to redesign an online rural education course. A gamified, case-based approach was applied to increase student engagement and motivation. Preservice teachers are immersed in an online, simulated rural context, where they navigate the experience of appointment to a rural school. This paper describes the rationale for the course redevelopment and outlines the design process. Student course feedback pre- and post-development was analysed to evaluate the outcomes achieved from the course redevelopment. The findings indicate that student engagement rose after the redevelopment, and critical reflection from the course team indicated that students were more effectively able to connect with course themes and project themselves into the position of a beginning teacher in a rural or remote location. While the development of the course is a work in progress, the initial gamification work has enabled preservice teachers to improve their classroom and community readiness for appointment to rural and remote schools, while exposing them to modelling of effective and contemporary use of technology and pedagogy which can be applied to their future classroom contexts.
Angeli, C. (2004). The effects of case-based learning on early childhood pre-service teachers' beliefs about the pedagogical uses of ICT. Journal of Educational Media, 29(2), 139–151.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2012). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Available from: http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/Overview/Purpose
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2013). Accreditation of Initial Teacher Education Programs in Australia. Available from: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/verve/_resources/Guide_to_the_accreditation_process_file.pdf
Boylan, C., & McSwan, D. (1998). Long-staying rural teachers: Who are they? Australian Journal of Education, 42(1), 49–65.
Burke, B. (2014). Gamify: How gamification motivates people to do extraordinary things. [Books 24x7 version] Available from: http://common.books24x7.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/toc.aspx?bookid=64441
Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11, 461–466.
Ching, C.P. (2014). Linking theory to practice: A case-based approach in teacher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 123, 280–288.
Commonwealth Schools Commission. (1987). The National Policy on the Education of Girls in Australia. Canberra: AGPS.
Daniels, M. (2012). The gamification of education. Available from: https://www.knewton.com/resources/blog/education-infographics/the-gamification-of-education-infographic/
Ewing, R.A., Smith, D., & Horsley, M. (2003). An inquiry, case based approach to teacher education: Findings and implications. Change: Transformations in Education, 6(2), 46–56.
Fenn, J., & Raskino, M. (2013). Understanding Gartner's Hype Cycles. Available from http://www.gartner.com/document/code/251964
Forster, J., & Horsley, M. (1999). Cases within cases: Transformation and context. Change: Transformations in Education, 2(2), 48–65.
Frid, S., Smith, M., Sparrow, L., & Trinidad, S. (2008). An exploration of issues in the attraction and retention of teachers to non-metropolitan schools in Western Australia. Education in Rural Australia, 18(1), 20–29.
Frid, S., Smith, M., Sparrow, L. & Trinidad, S. (2009). An examination of innovations in Mathematics, Information and Communication Technology and Science in a pre-service teacher education program. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(5), 517–536.
Gibson, I.W., & King, S. (1998). Preparing for rural teaching: A national survey of Australia’s efforts in providing appropriately trained teachers for rural and isolated communities. Paper presented at the 14th National Society for the Provision of Education in Rural Australia conference, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, October 7–10.
Halsey, R. J. (2005). Pre-service country teaching in Australia: What's happening—what needs to happen? Paper presented at the 21st Society for the Provision of Education in Rural Australia Conference. Darwin, NT.
Halsey, J. (2006). Towards a spatial ‘self-help’ map for teaching and living in a rural context. International Education Journal, 7(4), 490–498.
Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2001). Web-based strategies for professional induction in rural, regional and remote areas. In P.L. Jeffery (Ed.), Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) International Educational Research Conference. Fremantle.
Heitzmann, R. (2008). Case study instruction in teacher education: Opportunity to develop students’ critical thinking, school smarts and decision making. Education, 128(4), 523–541.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (2000). Recommendations: National Inquiry into Rural and Remote Education. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission: Sydney.
Information Resources Management Association. (2015). Gamification: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Available from: http://common.books24x7.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/toc.aspx?bookid=46257 .
Kim, B. (2015). Chapter 5: Designing gamification in the right way. Library Technology Reports, 51(2), 29.
Lieberoth, A. (2014). Shallow gamification: Testing psychological effects of framing an activity as a game. Games and Culture, doi:10.1177/1555412014559978
Lock, G. (2007). The student teacher rural experience program: Preparing preservice teachers to live in regional locations. Paper presented at the 23rd SPERA National Rural Education Conference, Perth, 30–31 August.
Manuel, J. (2003). ‘Such are the ambitions of youth’: Exploring issues of retention and attrition of early career teachers in New South Wales. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 139–151.
Marache-Francisco, C., & Brangier, E. (2015). Gamification and human-machine interaction: A synthesis. Le Travail Humain, 78(1), 165–190.
Ministerial Council for Employment Education Training and Youth Affairs Taskforce in Rural and Remote Education. (2001). National Framework for Rural and Remote Education in Australia, Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17, 112–119.
Ministerial Review of Schooling in Rural Western Australia. (1994). Schooling in Rural Western Australia. Perth: Western Australia Education Department.
Monroe, A.E., Blackwell, S.E., & Pepper, S.K. (2010). Strengthening professional development partnerships while bridging classroom management instruction and practice. The Professional Educator, 34(2).
National Health and Research Council, (2015). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007 - updated May 2015). Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e72_national_statement_may_2015_150514_a.pdf
New Media Consortium [NMC] (2013) Horizon Report – 2013 Higher Education Edition. Available from: http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2013-horizon-report-HE.pdf
Ramsey, G. (2000). Quality matters. Revitalising teaching: Critical times, critical choices. Teacher Education Review in New South Wales. NSW: NSW Department of Education and Training.
Rapp, A. (2015). A qualitative investigation of gamification: Motivational factors in online gamified services and applications. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 11(1), 67–82.
Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Savery, J. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.
Sharplin, E. (2002). Rural retreat or outback hell: Expectations of rural and remote teaching. Issues in Educational Research, 12, 49–63.
Sharplin, E. (2008). Quality of worklife for rural and remote teachers: Perspectives of novice, interstate and overseas-qualified teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Australia.
Sharplin, E. (2011). Teaching out-of-field: The experiences of rural teachers. Paper presented at ISFIRE 2011: Second International Symposium for Innovation in Rural Education: New directions for educational welfare in rural schools. 9-11 February, 2011 Kongju National University, Kongju, Korea.
Shulman, J.H. (1992). Case methods in teacher education. NY: Teachers College Press.
Simon,F., & Nemeth, K. (2012). Digital decisions: Choosing the right technology tools for early childhood education. Beltsville, MD: Gryphon House.
Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Jackson, A. Y., Moore, C., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 8–24.
Stensmo, C. (1999). Case methodology in teacher education compared to ‘traditional’ academic teaching: A field experiment. Paper presented at the 8th European Conference for Research on learning and Instruction (EARLI), August 24-28, 1999, Goteborg, Sweden.
Stott, A., & Neustaedter, C. (2013). Analysis of gamification in education. Technical Report 2013-0422-01, Connections Lab, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canada, April.
Sullivan, A., & Johnson, B. (2012). Questionable practices? Relying on individual teacher resilience in remote schools [online]. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22(3), 101–116.
Twomey, L. [Chair] (2008). If you think education is expensive. Perth, WA: Department of Education Training.
Waghorn, A., & Stevens, K. (1996). Communication between theory and practice: How student teachers develop theories of teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 21(2). Available from:
Wallace, A., & Boylan, C. (2007). Reawakening education policy and practice in rural Australia. In N. Rees, D. Boyd, & E. Terry (Eds.), 23rd National Rural Education Conference Proceedings. Collaboration for success in rural and remote education and training (pp. 15-29). Perth: SPERA
Watson, A. (1988). Professional development in rural schools: A case study of teacher satisfaction and interests. In Reeves, D. (Ed.) Rural Communities: Determining their future. 4th Annual SPERA Conference. SPERA: Toowoomba.
White, S., Reid, J., Lock, G., Hastings, W., & Green, W. (2008). Teacher education for rural communities: A focus on ‘Incentives’. Paper presented at the Australian Teacher Educators’ National Conference, Sunshine Coast, Qld. 8–11 July 2008.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development [ASCD].
Yarrow, A., Herschell, P., & Millwater, J. (1999). Listening to country voices: Preparing, attracting and retaining teachers for rural and remote areas. Education in Rural Australia, 9(2), 1–12.
Zang, R., & Blasi, L. (2010). Learning through web-based multistoryline case studies. A design-based research. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(3), 175–182.
Manuscripts submitted for publication should not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. It is the responsibility of authors to secure release of any copyright materials included in their manuscripts, and to provide written evidence of this to the editors. If accepted and published, papers become the copyright of the Australian and International Journal of Rural Education.
Papers are accepted on the understanding that they are subject to editorial revision. The Editorial Committee cannot guarantee that all contributions will be published nor give definite dates of publication. However, contributors will be advised if their papers are not accepted or if there will be a long publication delay.