Rural Schools and Local Development in Portugal: Rehabilitation, Participation and Socio-educational Innovation
Keywords:rural schools, local development, socio-educational practices, good practices, participatory research, community participation
â€œÃ€ Descoberta do Mundo Ruralâ€ [Discovering the Rural World] was a 15-month-long project, based on a partnership between the Institute of Educational Communities (ICE) and the Portuguese Association for Local Development (ANIMAR), both Portuguese NGOs, and financed by national and European funds. Its purpose was to identify and give visibility to formal and informal local development initiatives taking place in rural contexts across Portugal. The research team contacted and visited several places and talked directly with the initiativesâ€™ representatives, as well as with other locally relevant social actors, such as representatives of local governments, schools, associations and charity organisations. Based on a participatory community-based research, local development was conceptualised as an educational process from a broader perspective than that of schooling. Through eight selected case studies, this paper focuses on how rural schools promote, participate in or otherwise contribute to the socio-educational development of the communities in which they are located.
Ahari, S. S., Habibzadeh, S., Yousefi, M., Amani, F., & Abdi, R. (2012). Community-based needs assessment in an urban area: A participatory action research project. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 161â€“168.
Amaro, R. R. (2003). Desenvolvimento â€“ um conceito ultrapassado ou em renovaÃ§Ã£o? Da teoria Ã prÃ¡tica e da prÃ¡tica Ã teoria [Development â€“ an outdated or a renewed concept? From theory to practice and from practice to theory] . Cadernos de Estudos Africanos, 4, 35â€“70.
Bernstein, R. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33â€“46.
CanÃ¡rio, R. (2000). A escola no mundo rural: Contributos para a construÃ§Ã£o de um objeto de estudo [The school in the rural world: Contributions for the construction of a study object]. EducaÃ§Ã£o, Sociedade & Culturas, 14, 121â€“139.
Caride, J., Freitas, O., & Vargas, G. (2007). EducaÃ§Ã£o e desenvolvimento comunitÃ¡rio local. Perspectivas pedagÃ³gicas e sociais da sustentabilidade [Education and local community development. Pedagogic and social perspectives on sustainability]. Porto, Portugal: ProfediÃ§Ãµes.
Corbett, M. (2016). Rural futures: Development, aspirations, mobilities, place, and education. Peabody Journal of Education, 91, 270â€“282. doi: 10.1080/0161956X.2016.1151750
dâ€™Espiney, R. (1994). Escolas Isoladas: Uma problemÃ¡tica de rede escolar ou pedagÃ³gica? [Isolated Schools: a problema with the school network or with pedagogy?]. In R. dâ€™Espiney (Org.), Escolas Isoladas em Movimento [Isolated schools in motion] (pp. 37â€“50). SetÃºbal, Portugal: ICE.
Ferreira, F. I. (2003). A visÃ£o escolocÃªntrica da educaÃ§Ã£o em contexto rural: o mito da concentraÃ§Ã£o e da homogeneidade [The school-centered vision of education in the rural context: the myth of concentration and homogeneity]. Aprender, 28, 84â€“95.
Ferreira, F. I. (2005). O local em educaÃ§Ã£o. AnimaÃ§Ã£o, gestÃ£o e parceria [The local in education. Animation, management and partnership]. Lisboa, Portugal: FundaÃ§Ã£o Calouste Gulbenkian.
Ferreira, F. I. (2008). Education, social mediation and community development: An ethnographic research in a rural area. Community Development Journal, 44(4), 460â€“469.
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA â€˜effectâ€™ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23â€“37.
Instituto das Comunidades Educativas, & AssociaÃ§Ã£o Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento Local. (2013). Ã€ descoberta do mundo rural â€“ Guia de boas prÃ¡ticas [Discovering the rural world â€“ Good practices' guide]. Mafra, Portugal: GrÃ¡fica Sobreirense.
Jacquez, F., Vaughn, L. M., & Wagner, E. (2013). Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: A review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 176â€“189.
Jean, Y. (1998). Revoir nos reprÃ©sentations [Revue our representations]. Les Cahiers PÃ©dagogiques, 365, 22â€“24.
Johnson, C. (2015). Local civil participation and democratic legitimacy: Evidence from England and Wales. Political Studies, 63, 765â€“792.
Kiisel, M. (2013). Local community participation in the planning process: A case of bounded communicative rationality. European Planning Studies, 21(2), 232â€“250.
Latouche, S. (2010). Farewell to growth. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through â€˜what worksâ€™: The OECDâ€™s PISA for schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281â€“302.
LÃºcio, J. (2011). A mediaÃ§Ã£o sÃ³cio-educativa na construÃ§Ã£o da cidade educadora: O projeto â€œMassarelos, Freguesia Educadoraâ€. Tese de doutoramento em ciÃªncias da educaÃ§Ã£o [Social-educational mediation in the construction of the educating city: The project â€œMassarelos, Educating Civil Parishâ€. Doctoral thesis in Education Sciences]. Porto, Portugal: Author.
Nygreen, K., Kwon, S. A., & SÃ¡nchez, P. (2006). Urban youth building community: Social change and participatory research in schools, homes, and community-based organizations. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1/2), 107â€“123.
Ozer, E. J., & Douglas, L. (2013). The impact of participatory research on urban teens: An experimental evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 66â€“75.
Portugal/MinistÃ©rio da EducaÃ§Ã£o. (1998). Decree-Law 115-A/98, Lisboa, DiÃ¡rio da RepÃºblica â€“ I SÃ©rie-A, n. 102, 4-5-1998.
Reid, J., Green, B., Cooper, M., Hasting, W., Lock, G., & White, S. (2010). Regenerating rural social space? Teacher education for rural-regional sustainability. Australian Journal of Education, 54(3) 262â€“267.
Rubin, D. I., & Kazanjian, C. J. (2011). Just another brick in the wall: Standardization and the devaluing of education. New Mexico State University Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(2), 94â€“108.
Talavera, P. (2014). Economicism and nihilism in the eclipse of humanism. Humanities, 3(3), 340â€“378.
Vachon, B. (1993). Le dÃ©veloppement locale: ThÃ©orie et pratique [Local development: Theory and practice]. Paris, France: Gaetan Morin Ã‰diteur.
Woods, D. W. (2014) Democratic community participation: Bernstein between Dewey and an achieved deeply democratic future. In J. M. Green (Ed.), Richard J. Bernstein and the pragmatist turn in contemporary: Philosophy rekindling pragmatismâ€™s fire (pp. 131â€“147). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yull, D., Blitz, L. V., Thompson, T., & Murray, C. (2014). Can we talk? Using community-based participatory action research to build family and school partnerships with families of colour. School Community Journal, 24(2), 9â€“31.
- 24-07-2022 (2)
- 08-09-2017 (1)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2017 Australian and International Journal of Rural Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Manuscripts submitted for publication should not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. It is the responsibility of authors to secure release of any copyright materials included in their manuscripts, and to provide written evidence of this to the editors. If accepted and published, papers become the copyright of the Australian and International Journal of Rural Education.
Papers are accepted on the understanding that they are subject to editorial revision. The Editorial Committee cannot guarantee that all contributions will be published nor give definite dates of publication. However, contributors will be advised if their papers are not accepted or if there will be a long publication delay.