"Yes, The Power Is In The Town": An Ethnographic Study Of Student Participation In A Rural Swedish Secondary School
This article is based on an ethnographic case study and highlights the importance of spatial dimensions and spatial inequality as means of understanding the participation of a group of youths living in a sparsely populated rural area of Sweden. The analysis took as its starting point Doreen Massey’s conceptualisation of place and space as comprising extended social relations that are in a state of constant change connected to power relations. The data analysis focused on the activities that the youths took part in and how they expressed their participation and agency in society at local, regional and national levels. The results point to variability in youth participation at different levels and indicate that visible and meaningful social relations are important for youth participation and their understandings of participation. The trends suggest that student agency and statements in relation to possible and actual participation are strongest at both school and local levels, and decrease and change to more resistance and silence at regional and national levels.
BBC. (2016, March 14). Report aims to tackle Scottish university inequality [Online news]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-35804363
Blenkinshop, S., McCrone, T., Wade, P., & Morris, M. (2006). How do young people make choices at 14 and 16? [Research Report No. 773]. Annerley, Nottingham: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Commission for Rural Communities. (2012). Barriers to education, employment and training for your people in rural areas. Gloucester: Author. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/15199/1/Barriers-to-education-employment-and-training-for-young-people-in-rural-areas.pdf
Commission on Widening Access. (2016). A blueprint for fairness. Edinburgh, Scotland: The Scottish Government. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0049/00496535.pdf
Connor, H., & Dewson, S. (2001). Social class and higher education: Issues affecting decisions on participation by lower social class groups. Nottingham, UK: Department for Education and Employment.
Croxford, L., & Raffe, D. (2013). Differentiation and social segregation of UK higher education 1996-2010. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 172–192.
Forsyth, A., & Furlong, A. (2003). Losing out? Socioeconomic disadvantage and access to higher education. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Frenette, M. (2004). Access to college and university: Does distance to school matter? Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 30(4), 427–443.
Gibbons, S., & Vignoles, A. (2012). Geography, choice and participation in higher education in England. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 98–113.
Gorard, S., Adnett, N., May, H., Slack, K., Smith, E., & Thomas, L. (2007). Overcoming the barriers to higher education. Oakhill, VA: Trentham Books.
Hartas, D. (2016). Young people’s educational aspirations: Psychological factors and the home environment. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(9), 1145–1163.
James, R., Wyn, J., Baldwin, G., Hepworth, G., McInnis, C., & Stephanou, A. (1999). Rural and isolated school students and their higher education choices: A re-examination of student location, socioeconomic background, and educational advantage and disadvantage [Commissioned Report No. 62]. Melbourne, Vic.: Centre for the Study of Higher Education and Youth Research Centre, The University of Melbourne.
Kintrea, K., St Clair, R., & Houston, M. (2011). The influence of parents, places and poverty on educational attitudes and aspirations. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/young-people-education-attitudes-full.pdf
Lasselle, L. (2016). Barriers to higher education entry – a Scottish rural perspective. Scottish Educational Review, 48(1), 78–88.
Lasselle, L., Kirby, G., & Macpherson, R. (2015). Access to higher education for rural communities: An exploratory analysis. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10023/7553
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). OECD rural policy reviews, Scotland, UK. Paris: Author.
Raffe, D., & Croxford, L. (2015). How stable is the stratification of higher education in England and Scotland? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 313–335.
Riddell, S. (2014). Key informants’ views of higher education in Scotland [Working Paper 5]. Edinburgh, Scotland: Centre for Research in Education Inclusion and Diversity, University of Edinburgh.
Scottish Government. (2012). SIMD, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation [Website]. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/SIMD
Scottish Government. (2014, November 26). First Minister – Programme for Government [Speech/briefing]. Retrieved from https://news.gov.scot/speeches-and-briefings/first-minister-programme-for-government
Skerratt, S., Atterton, J., Brodie, E., Carson, D., Heggie, R., McCracken, D., … Woolvin, M. (2014). Rural Scotland in focus: 2014 [Report]. Edinburgh, Scotland: Rural Policy Centre, SRUC, Scotland’s Rural College.
Spielhofler, T., Golden, S., & Evans, K. (2011). Young people’s aspirations in rural areas. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Victorian Auditor-General’s Office. (2014, April 3). Access to education for rural education [PP No 305, Session 2010-14]. Melbourne, Vic.: Victorian Government.
Walsh, S., Flannery, D., & Cullinan, J. (2015). Geographic accessibility to higher education on the island of Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 34(1), 5–23.
Manuscripts submitted for publication should not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. It is the responsibility of authors to secure release of any copyright materials included in their manuscripts, and to provide written evidence of this to the editors. If accepted and published, papers become the copyright of the Australian and International Journal of Rural Education.
Papers are accepted on the understanding that they are subject to editorial revision. The Editorial Committee cannot guarantee that all contributions will be published nor give definite dates of publication. However, contributors will be advised if their papers are not accepted or if there will be a long publication delay.